Machine Gun Kelly and Megan Fox have never been a conventional couple. From their intense public displays of affection to their cryptic spiritual connections, the pair has kept fans—and critics—intrigued.
However, one of the most shocking aspects of their relationship came when MGK revealed that the engagement ring he designed for Fox wasn’t just a symbol of love, but also of pain.
The rapper-turned-rocker proudly shared that the ring, which features thorns, is designed to hurt Fox if she ever tries to remove it. “The bands are actually thorns. So if she tries to take it off, it hurts. Love is pain,” he told the media when he first proposed.
While some found this gesture romantic, many others were disturbed, questioning why a ring should be associated with pain in any way.
For centuries, engagement rings have symbolized commitment, love, and eternity. MGK’s interpretation, however, takes a darker turn.
The idea that Fox should feel pain if she ever decides to remove her ring raises uncomfortable questions about the nature of their relationship.
While MGK claims the ring represents the intensity of their bond, critics argue that love should never be about control or suffering. Relationships thrive on trust, mutual respect, and freedom—none of which should involve physical pain as a deterrent to leaving.
Many women in particular have voiced their concerns, calling the concept problematic. “This isn’t love, it’s a red flag,” one person tweeted. Another added, “Romanticizing pain in relationships is dangerous.” Some even likened the ring to toxic behaviors disguised as grand romantic gestures.
The controversy doesn’t end with the ring. During their engagement, MGK and Fox also performed a ritual where they drank each other’s blood. The couple has often spoken about their connection being otherworldly and spiritual, but this particular act left even some of their biggest supporters baffled.
Drinking blood has long been associated with certain ancient practices, but in modern times, it carries a much darker connotation. While some defended their ritual as simply an intense expression of love, others criticized it as unnecessary, even disturbing.
Following these revelations, MGK faced a wave of criticism, particularly from female fans. Many questioned whether his idea of love was influenced by control and unhealthy obsession rather than genuine partnership.
The engagement ring, in particular, became a major talking point in discussions about the glorification of toxicity in celebrity relationships.
Megan Fox, on the other hand, has always defended their connection, describing it as deep and transformative. She has spoken about their “twin flame” dynamic, which she believes transcends traditional relationships.
However, to the public, their love story continues to raise eyebrows.
Even some relationship experts have weighed in, suggesting that while passion is important in love, the need to associate it with physical pain and blood rituals can signal deeper issues. Love should be built on care, trust, and emotional depth—not fear or suffering.
Given MGK and Fox’s history of shocking headlines, some believe this could all be an elaborate way to keep the public talking. Both stars have successfully built an image around their dark, rebellious love story.
In Hollywood, where publicity is everything, their bizarre engagement details might just be another way to maintain their mystique.
However, whether it’s real or just for attention, the response from fans and critics suggests that this kind of narrative isn’t being received as positively as they might have hoped.
Despite the backlash, the couple seems unfazed by the criticism. They continue to express their love in unconventional ways, unapologetic about how their relationship is perceived.
However, the intense scrutiny surrounding their engagement has left many wondering whether this level of passion can be sustained—or if it will eventually burn out.
As fans continue to analyze their every move, one thing is clear: MGK and Megan Fox aren’t afraid to push boundaries, even if it means stirring up controversy.
